<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cover &amp; Interview: Behemoth by Scott Westerfeld</title>
	<atom:link href="http://suvudu.com/2010/07/cover-interview-behemoth-by-scott-westerfeld.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sf-fantasy.suvudu.com/2010/07/cover-interview-behemoth-by-scott-westerfeld.html</link>
	<description>Suvudu - Science Fiction and Fantasy Books, Movies, and Games</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:25:54 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Totalblamblam</title>
		<link>http://sf-fantasy.suvudu.com/2010/07/cover-interview-behemoth-by-scott-westerfeld.html/comment-page-1#comment-21261</link>
		<dc:creator>Totalblamblam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 02:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://suvudu.com/2010/07/cover-interview-behemoth-by-scott-westerfeld.html#comment-21261</guid>
		<description>The cover for Behemoth, and the retrograde cover for Leviathan, are abysmal. The original Leviathan cover was the reason I picked it up and then recommended it to all my sci-fi reading friends. It&#039;s a steampunk book, and the cover fit perfectly with the story and with Keith Thompson&#039;s illustrations. 

I was really looking forward to Behemoth giving us another brilliant covering featuring a more organic setting. Instead we get a shiny teen face slopped on the cover as so many other YA books have and that makes it look as if it&#039;s some teen romance book. Not only that but from even a slight distance the face looks eerily disembodied as the rest of the cover is so dark and the face is so bright.

I honestly think the cover was a major miscalculation. I think it has alienated a lot of fans and will not draw any new readers in. This is actually the first time I have seen anyone at all praise the new cover, with the concensus being that the UK cover, while not ideal, is a massive improvement. 

It is just really disheartening that what could have been a brilliantly produced series that would stand out on a bookshelf and hold it&#039;s head high in the company of such classics as Phillip Pullman&#039;s Northern Lights, has instead been relegated to the annals of another failed commitment by a publisher to have the conviction to produce something more than just a story.

At least the story, by all accounts, is still the top-notch storytelling we have all come to expect from Westerfeld. I have not read it myself. I have to wait for my library to get a copy as I sahn&#039;t be purchasing it. My hope now is that when the series is finished an omnibus edition will be released (mega-hardback that will be) and it will be more in keeping with the artistic style with which the series began.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The cover for Behemoth, and the retrograde cover for Leviathan, are abysmal. The original Leviathan cover was the reason I picked it up and then recommended it to all my sci-fi reading friends. It&#8217;s a steampunk book, and the cover fit perfectly with the story and with Keith Thompson&#8217;s illustrations. </p>
<p>I was really looking forward to Behemoth giving us another brilliant covering featuring a more organic setting. Instead we get a shiny teen face slopped on the cover as so many other YA books have and that makes it look as if it&#8217;s some teen romance book. Not only that but from even a slight distance the face looks eerily disembodied as the rest of the cover is so dark and the face is so bright.</p>
<p>I honestly think the cover was a major miscalculation. I think it has alienated a lot of fans and will not draw any new readers in. This is actually the first time I have seen anyone at all praise the new cover, with the concensus being that the UK cover, while not ideal, is a massive improvement. </p>
<p>It is just really disheartening that what could have been a brilliantly produced series that would stand out on a bookshelf and hold it&#8217;s head high in the company of such classics as Phillip Pullman&#8217;s Northern Lights, has instead been relegated to the annals of another failed commitment by a publisher to have the conviction to produce something more than just a story.</p>
<p>At least the story, by all accounts, is still the top-notch storytelling we have all come to expect from Westerfeld. I have not read it myself. I have to wait for my library to get a copy as I sahn&#8217;t be purchasing it. My hope now is that when the series is finished an omnibus edition will be released (mega-hardback that will be) and it will be more in keeping with the artistic style with which the series began.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E.</title>
		<link>http://sf-fantasy.suvudu.com/2010/07/cover-interview-behemoth-by-scott-westerfeld.html/comment-page-1#comment-20244</link>
		<dc:creator>E.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 20:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://suvudu.com/2010/07/cover-interview-behemoth-by-scott-westerfeld.html#comment-20244</guid>
		<description>I thought that was the case - publishers taking over the cover design specs. I&#039;m rather disappointed - They really ought to have continued the original; the new designs look tacky and clashes with the illustrations. If it&#039;s inviting to some - fair enough- but I personally found the original more enthralling [and just knowing Keith Thompson was responsible was enough to pick it up]. 

I shouldn&#039;t judge a book by its cover but I am very big on covers... 

Sadly I&#039;m hesitant to buy it. Even the UK version is... weird. Is there NO cover that continues from the original publication?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought that was the case &#8211; publishers taking over the cover design specs. I&#8217;m rather disappointed &#8211; They really ought to have continued the original; the new designs look tacky and clashes with the illustrations. If it&#8217;s inviting to some &#8211; fair enough- but I personally found the original more enthralling [and just knowing Keith Thompson was responsible was enough to pick it up]. </p>
<p>I shouldn&#8217;t judge a book by its cover but I am very big on covers&#8230; </p>
<p>Sadly I&#8217;m hesitant to buy it. Even the UK version is&#8230; weird. Is there NO cover that continues from the original publication?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


